Trends in fashion change regularly but they seem to have been repeating themselves in time. The common vintage flow in clothing lines showed up some time ago and is still a hit. But is it still vintage if it's a label?
Brands in general are more expensive than non-label goods, no matter if we consider clothing, electronic devices, cars or, for that matter, anything else. If it's possible to put a label on the good, it's being done. The brand costs usually more because people are willing to pay more for it. A label is usually associated with a specific quality, a defined standard that can be expected from the purchase. It seems perfectly logical to work on a strong brand that would attract customers and build a bond with the clients.
It's already been some time since the trend of vintage clothing introduced itself in fashion. Tasty, old-school look became very popular and has spread incredibly fast. However, wasn't the trend related to the vintage clothes not to vintage-looking clothes? Let's be honest, the designers introduced the trend, the labels owned it but at some point it got so widely present that most of the clothing companies, not just the huge ones but others as well, started implementing the style in their clothing lines. Customers were given a whole range of those specific goods but again, how much vintage is included?
The main question is, what do we expect? The true fashion freak would probably rather go to the vintage store and search for some unique pieces but the common consumer? Possibly rather not. So the introduction of the clothes that only look old-school might be a good solution to stay hip, even if they cost more, well, much more.
Now, there's just one thing - the label vintage is not truly real its just inspired by the original idea of the trend. Is it worth spending great money on those clothes then? Or maybe it's not about being loyal to the style and search for the genuine vintage items but about wearing a label and trusting the brand? How vintage can the label get?
Brands in general are more expensive than non-label goods, no matter if we consider clothing, electronic devices, cars or, for that matter, anything else. If it's possible to put a label on the good, it's being done. The brand costs usually more because people are willing to pay more for it. A label is usually associated with a specific quality, a defined standard that can be expected from the purchase. It seems perfectly logical to work on a strong brand that would attract customers and build a bond with the clients.
It's already been some time since the trend of vintage clothing introduced itself in fashion. Tasty, old-school look became very popular and has spread incredibly fast. However, wasn't the trend related to the vintage clothes not to vintage-looking clothes? Let's be honest, the designers introduced the trend, the labels owned it but at some point it got so widely present that most of the clothing companies, not just the huge ones but others as well, started implementing the style in their clothing lines. Customers were given a whole range of those specific goods but again, how much vintage is included?
The main question is, what do we expect? The true fashion freak would probably rather go to the vintage store and search for some unique pieces but the common consumer? Possibly rather not. So the introduction of the clothes that only look old-school might be a good solution to stay hip, even if they cost more, well, much more.
Now, there's just one thing - the label vintage is not truly real its just inspired by the original idea of the trend. Is it worth spending great money on those clothes then? Or maybe it's not about being loyal to the style and search for the genuine vintage items but about wearing a label and trusting the brand? How vintage can the label get?